| | more rulings to ask ;D | |
|
+7bahamut84 d3stin3d lingbu Ball-Snow Lauren vampirerion curryman 11 posters | Author | Message |
---|
curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: more rulings to ask ;D Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:12 pm | |
| 1. if i activate vahala's effect to spc summon a fairy from hand, do i target a fairy in my hand? if yes, do i need to reveal that specific angel first? === Ans: no ===
2. if i activate vahala's effect to spc summon a fairy from hand, do i target a fairy in my hand? if yes, can i chain trapdustshoot and return that specific angel back to deck and thus the player loses target? === Ans: no ===
3. can i divine warning vahala when it activates it's effect? === Ans: no ===
4. if i use test tiger effect to return murmillo to my deck and my opponent chains divine warning, what happens to murmillo and my test tiger === Ans: murmillo lives while tiger goes to grave ===
5. if i use murmillo and attack, the attack is successful and i tag a bestiari after battle, can opponent chain an effect veiler? === Ans: no ===
6. if my opponent has a caius and forumla, i activate dark hole. he accel into stardust, what happens? will stardust be chain 3 or stardust die w/o being able to use his effect? === Ans: stardust just die ===
7. if i have a ladd on my field and my opponent activates vahala, it's effect is negated and it stays as a blank card on the field forever. correct or wrong?
8. if i have a ladd on my field and my opponent activates vahala, it's effect is negated and it stays as a blank card on the field and when ladd is gone, it's effect can be activated again. correct or wrong?
7. if i have a ladd on my field and my opponent activates vahala, it's effect is negated and it is sent to the grave but not considered as destroyed. correct or wrong?
8. if i have no hand cards, i tune out a formulae and draw 1 card, i drew tg werewolf, can i spc summon the werewolf i drew?
9. if i instant fuse, the target was flipped face down by book of moon, does it die during the end phase? [i am asking because i saw a video from duelingdays and they used summoner of illusion to pull out a extrio and it got flipped face down, but end phase it stays on the field. is it that illusion summoner ruling is different from instant fuse?]
hope for any help, thanks guys. don't take me for a retard, i am asking these as people often ask me too. so i want to know how to explain to them, sheesh
`
Last edited by curryman on Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:33 am; edited 4 times in total | |
| | | vampirerion Elite Duelist
Number of posts : 1981 Age : 1490 Location : France Registration date : 2010-06-21
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:30 pm | |
| No you dun have to reveal. You can chain trapdustshoot. You can't warning vahalla. Tribute test tiger chain warning test tiger dies murmillo stay. Chain formula to dark hole, the synchro monster will die to dark hole. Battle phase cannot veiler. | |
| | | Lauren Junior Duelist
Number of posts : 186 Age : 30 Location : Ang Mo Kio Registration date : 2009-05-21
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:44 pm | |
| 1. Nope, you do not have to target or reveal a Fairy in your hand when activating Valhalla's effect. But you do have to have at least one Fairy that can be special summoned from your hand or you cannot activate its effect at all.
2. No, you do not target a Fairy in your hand. When you activate Valhalla's effect to special summon a Fairy and then your opponent sends one of them back to your deck through Trap Dustshoot, you have to summon another Fairy if you have one in your hand.
3. No, because Solemn Warning negates an activation of a Spell card that Special Summons a monster but Valhalla does not Special Summon a monster during its activation. Do not confuse this with Royal Oppression which negates the effect of a card that Special Summons a monster. (In short, Solemn Warning cannot negate Valhalla while Royal Oppression can.)
4. Test Tiger is released as a Cost, so it is sent to the Graveyard. Test Tiger's effect Targets Murmillo first, then Solemn Warning negates the effect of Test Tiger in the Graveyard. (Murmillo is still left on the field)
5. No, because the Tag Out is done during the End of The Battle Phase which is still in the Battle Phase.
6. CL1 Dark Hole, CL2 Formula. Chain Resolves backwards and Stardust is Summoned and then Destroyed by Dark Hole. You cannot interupt during the Chain. | |
| | | Ball-Snow Millennium Earl
Number of posts : 786 Age : 32 Location : Singapore - Bishan Registration date : 2009-03-03
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:50 pm | |
| - curryman wrote:
- 1. if i activate vahala's effect to spc summon a fairy from hand, do i target a fairy in my hand? if yes, do i need to reveal that specific angel first?
No, but you must a legal angel monster to sp to activate vahala's effect
2. if i activate vahala's effect to spc summon a fairy from hand, do i target a fairy in my hand? if yes, can i chain trapdustshoot and return that specific angel back to deck and thus the player loses target? There is no targeting of a monster from your hand, just need to have a legal monster to be sp-ed out. If your opp chains trapdust shoot to your vahala, and yet u still have another legal angel to sp, u must sp that angel out . If no other legal monster to sp, nothing happens after so.
3. can i divine warning vahala when it activates it's effect? No, you cannot.
4. if i use test tiger effect to return murmillo to my deck and my opponent chains divine warning, what happens to murmillo and my test tiger. Murmillo still remains on the field, test tiger's effect is negated. This is because test tiger's effect of returning the monster and sp-ing the monster happens in the same chain (e.g. vayu's effect).
5. if i use murmillo and attack, the attack is successful and i tag a bestiari after battle, can opponent chain an effect veiler? No (opps. thanks lauren, forget velier only main pharse ><)
6. if my opponent has a caius and forumla, i activate dark hole. he accel into stardust, what happens? will stardust be chain 3 or stardust die w/o being able to use his effect?[/size][/font] Stardust will just be destoryed w/o being able to use his effect and the chain is still on-going (chain1:darkhole, chain2: formula's effect)
| |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:32 am | |
| thanks all for the warm responses lauren - Quote :
- No, because Solemn Warning negates an activation of a Spell card that Special Summons a monster but Valhalla does not Special Summon a monster during its activation. Do not confuse this with Royal Oppression which negates the effect of a card that Special Summons a monster. (In short, Solemn Warning cannot negate Valhalla while Royal Oppression can.)
i don't quite get his part though, some of my friends say can. because vahala: you can Special Summon 1 Fairy-Type monster from your hand. which means if u activate the effect, which is to special summon, so i don't see the logic behind =x lauren - Quote :
- 6. CL1 Dark Hole, CL2 Formula. Chain Resolves backwards and Stardust is Summoned and then Destroyed by Dark Hole. You cannot interupt during the Chain.
why cannot interrupt? since stardust is a quick effect. how about another scenario that happened to me recently. my opponent has a stardust, i mind control him. he chain mst and i pass so mst chain 2, mind control chain 1, he then chain his stardust effect as chain 3. is it correct? if not, why? similar case as the accel synchro =x | |
| | | lingbu Judai Yuki
Number of posts : 2945 Age : 115 Location : Not for you to Stalk me! Registration date : 2007-12-18
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:10 am | |
| - curryman wrote:
- thanks all for the warm responses
lauren - Quote :
- No, because Solemn Warning negates an activation of a Spell card that Special Summons a monster but Valhalla does not Special Summon a monster during its activation. Do not confuse this with Royal Oppression which negates the effect of a card that Special Summons a monster. (In short, Solemn Warning cannot negate Valhalla while Royal Oppression can.)
i don't quite get his part though, some of my friends say can. because vahala: you can Special Summon 1 Fairy-Type monster from your hand.
which means if u activate the effect, which is to special summon, so i don't see the logic behind =x
lauren - Quote :
- 6. CL1 Dark Hole, CL2 Formula. Chain Resolves backwards and Stardust is Summoned and then Destroyed by Dark Hole. You cannot interupt during the Chain.
why cannot interrupt? since stardust is a quick effect. how about another scenario that happened to me recently.
my opponent has a stardust, i mind control him. he chain mst and i pass so mst chain 2, mind control chain 1, he then chain his stardust effect as chain 3. is it correct? if not, why? similar case as the accel synchro =x
Stardust wasnt summoned when the first card ( Dark hole ) activated. Dark hole ---> synchro formula + 6 star to stardust --> Dark hole activates its effect before stardust can interrupt. Mind control --> Cyclone --> You claim nothing to chain --> passed on back to your opponent --> he activates stardust to negate. The both scenario differ in the 1st sentence, stardust is not on field yet. However the second one stardust was all along on field. Give you another scenario: Cyclone set card --> call of living dead activates and revives stardust --> Stardust revived but cyclone destroyed it , stardust's effect is not permanent, it loses timing to activate. Stardust goes back to the grave with call of living dead. So if you are wondering why Jinzo is not destroyed if cyclone destroyed call of living dead that is chained to revive Jinzo, because Jinzo has a permanent effect ( sangan etc). Hope I can help you here, but if not... you can get another lady to.. if there are? Im not sure too~ | |
| | | Ball-Snow Millennium Earl
Number of posts : 786 Age : 32 Location : Singapore - Bishan Registration date : 2009-03-03
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 3:07 am | |
| - curryman wrote:
- thanks all for the warm responses
i don't quite get his part though, some of my friends say can. because vahala: you can Special Summon 1 Fairy-Type monster from your hand.
which means if u activate the effect, which is to special summon, so i don't see the logic behind =x
- Quote :
- Valhalla, Hall of the Fallen, Call of the Mummy, Black Garden, etc... don't "activate" to special summon. It creates a field condition that allows a special summon....
Thats the answer i found for it. It is saying that when you have no monsters on your field, your fulfilled the condition of valhalla and uses its effect to sp. This means there is no activation of valhalla's effect. and solemn's warning text reads - Quote :
- Negate the Summon of a monster OR the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s), and destroy that card.
it only negates activation of spell/trap tat special summons monsters however, for monsters, it negates the effect itself, meaning that activation of the monster's effect is not needed for solemn's warning to negate the monster's special summoning effect - curryman wrote:
why cannot interrupt? since stardust is a quick effect. how about another scenario that happened to me recently.
my opponent has a stardust, i mind control him. he chain mst and i pass so mst chain 2, mind control chain 1, he then chain his stardust effect as chain 3. is it correct? if not, why? similar case as the accel synchro =x
For your original question, darkhole was activated before stardust was on the field. So when the chain resolves, stardust is summoned, darkhole resolves(already activated). stardust effect text: - Quote :
- You can Tribute this card to negate the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that destroys a card(s) on the field, and destroy that card.
For your new scenario, stardust was on the field during the activation of MST, therefore he can respond to the MST before the chain resolves | |
| | | d3stin3d Millennium Earl
Number of posts : 379 Age : 111 Location : Indian Ocean Registration date : 2009-10-25
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:16 pm | |
| just remember this very simple ruling for yu-gi-oh
You cannot add in a new chain until u fully resolve the current one. | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:33 pm | |
| - lingbu wrote:
- curryman wrote:
- thanks all for the warm responses
lauren - Quote :
- No, because Solemn Warning negates an activation of a Spell card that Special Summons a monster but Valhalla does not Special Summon a monster during its activation. Do not confuse this with Royal Oppression which negates the effect of a card that Special Summons a monster. (In short, Solemn Warning cannot negate Valhalla while Royal Oppression can.)
i don't quite get his part though, some of my friends say can. because vahala: you can Special Summon 1 Fairy-Type monster from your hand.
which means if u activate the effect, which is to special summon, so i don't see the logic behind =x
lauren - Quote :
- 6. CL1 Dark Hole, CL2 Formula. Chain Resolves backwards and Stardust is Summoned and then Destroyed by Dark Hole. You cannot interupt during the Chain.
why cannot interrupt? since stardust is a quick effect. how about another scenario that happened to me recently.
my opponent has a stardust, i mind control him. he chain mst and i pass so mst chain 2, mind control chain 1, he then chain his stardust effect as chain 3. is it correct? if not, why? similar case as the accel synchro =x
Stardust wasnt summoned when the first card ( Dark hole ) activated.
Dark hole ---> synchro formula + 6 star to stardust --> Dark hole activates its effect before stardust can interrupt.
Mind control --> Cyclone --> You claim nothing to chain --> passed on back to your opponent --> he activates stardust to negate.
The both scenario differ in the 1st sentence, stardust is not on field yet. However the second one stardust was all along on field.
Give you another scenario: Cyclone set card --> call of living dead activates and revives stardust --> Stardust revived but cyclone destroyed it , stardust's effect is not permanent, it loses timing to activate. Stardust goes back to the grave with call of living dead.
So if you are wondering why Jinzo is not destroyed if cyclone destroyed call of living dead that is chained to revive Jinzo, because Jinzo has a permanent effect ( sangan etc).
Hope I can help you here, but if not... you can get another lady to.. if there are? Im not sure too~ hmmm, i understand now what what's with the last sentence? lol | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:57 pm | |
| bryan - Quote :
- and solemn's warning text reads
Quote: Negate the Summon of a monster OR the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s), and destroy that card. i understand the part of creating a field condition but the text says negate the summon of a monster OR the activation of a spell card that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s). the sentence says that it can destroy a card which includes an effect to spc summon. am i wrong? | |
| | | Ball-Snow Millennium Earl
Number of posts : 786 Age : 32 Location : Singapore - Bishan Registration date : 2009-03-03
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:07 pm | |
| - curryman wrote:
- bryan
- Quote :
- and solemn's warning text reads
Quote: Negate the Summon of a monster OR the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s), and destroy that card. i understand the part of creating a field condition but the text says negate the summon of a monster OR the activation of a spell card that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s). the sentence says that it can destroy a card which includes an effect to spc summon. am i wrong? - Quote :
card's activation is defined as casting from ONLY hand OR from set position on the spell/trap zone
activating a card's effect can be done anywhere. addon: Therefore, for spell and trap, the activation that allows to sp must be negated upon being used from hand / facedown on M/T zone. If it is already face-up, thus activation of the card is already done, you cannot solomn warning it
Last edited by Ball-Snow on Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:09 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
| | | bahamut84 Millennium Earl
Number of posts : 1232 Age : 39 Location : Antartica Registration date : 2007-12-16
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:08 pm | |
| Activating a spell/trap card is not equal to activating the effect of a spell/trap. Activating Valhalla (the card) does not result in a special summon, so you cannot warning. Activating Valhalla (the effect) cannot be warning because you are not activating the card. Just compare the text with Oppression. ============================= - Quote :
- the sentence says that it can destroy a card which includes an effect to spc summon
Please dont ever use the above sentence as an example again. I've had crazy people arguing as they use Solemn Warning on a Gale when the effect that halves is activated because the card includes an effect to special summon. | |
| | | shaunewbiez Elite Duelist
Number of posts : 1641 Age : 29 Location : Loyang, Pasir Ris Registration date : 2008-01-13
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 3:22 pm | |
| L-O-L. All kinds of crazy people in the world. >_> | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:59 pm | |
| - Ball-Snow wrote:
- curryman wrote:
- bryan
- Quote :
- and solemn's warning text reads
Quote: Negate the Summon of a monster OR the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s), and destroy that card. i understand the part of creating a field condition but the text says negate the summon of a monster OR the activation of a spell card that includes an effect that Special Summons a monster(s). the sentence says that it can destroy a card which includes an effect to spc summon. am i wrong? - Quote :
card's activation is defined as casting from ONLY hand OR from set position on the spell/trap zone
activating a card's effect can be done anywhere.
addon: Therefore, for spell and trap, the activation that allows to sp must be negated upon being used from hand / facedown on M/T zone. If it is already face-up, thus activation of the card is already done, you cannot solomn warning it ok liao, i finally understand from ur last statement. it clears up everything. thx =D | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:00 am | |
| - bahamut84 wrote:
- Activating a spell/trap card is not equal to activating the effect of a spell/trap.
Activating Valhalla (the card) does not result in a special summon, so you cannot warning.
Activating Valhalla (the effect) cannot be warning because you are not activating the card.
Just compare the text with Oppression.
=============================
- Quote :
- the sentence says that it can destroy a card which includes an effect to spc summon
Please dont ever use the above sentence as an example again.
I've had crazy people arguing as they use Solemn Warning on a Gale when the effect that halves is activated because the card includes an effect to special summon. i understand but i just want to know the way to explain to people as there's a lot of debate on it. i have more crazy people coming up with crazy rulings. hope you can kindly help. that would be good. thx baha =D
Last edited by curryman on Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:23 am; edited 1 time in total | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:12 am | |
| - shaunewbiez wrote:
- L-O-L. All kinds of crazy people in the world. >_>
agree, most of the rulings i ask were stuffs done by other people. i have more crazy rulings above, do take a look ^^ | |
| | | bishzor101 Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 680 Age : 31 Location : Singapore Registration date : 2008-11-29
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:09 am | |
| No. 7 - 9 Vahalla is sent to the Graveyard and not considered as destroyed. | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:18 pm | |
| - bishzor101 wrote:
- No. 7 - 9 Vahalla is sent to the Graveyard and not considered as destroyed.
ok, thanks for the reply : ) | |
| | | lingbu Judai Yuki
Number of posts : 2945 Age : 115 Location : Not for you to Stalk me! Registration date : 2007-12-18
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:38 pm | |
| 8. if i have no hand cards, i tune out a formulae and draw 1 card, i drew tg werewolf, can i spc summon the werewolf i drew?
Yes.
9. if i instant fuse, the target was flipped face down by book of moon, does it die during the end phase? [i am asking because i saw a video from duelingdays and they used summoner of illusion to pull out a extrio and it got flipped face down, but end phase it stays on the field. is it that illusion summoner ruling is different from instant fuse?]
Monster is refreshed but not counted as fusioned, so you can't revive if it goes to grave. think rescue cat, one is affected by book of moon, the other dies instead of the moon affected.
If you are wondering what is refreshed.. I have nothing to say.
| |
| | | bahamut84 Millennium Earl
Number of posts : 1232 Age : 39 Location : Antartica Registration date : 2007-12-16
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:10 pm | |
| 8. if i have no hand cards, i tune out a formulae and draw 1 card, i drew tg werewolf, can i spc summon the werewolf i drew?
No because its a different timing. | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:13 am | |
| - bahamut84 wrote:
- 8. if i have no hand cards, i tune out a formulae and draw 1 card, i drew tg werewolf, can i spc summon the werewolf i drew?
No because its a different timing. thx baha. | |
| | | hamtaro Duelist
Number of posts : 67 Age : 43 Location : Singapore Registration date : 2011-05-02
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Mon May 02, 2011 8:58 pm | |
| 7. if i have a ladd on my field and my opponent activates vahala, it's effect is negated and it stays as a blank card on the field forever. correct or wrong?
wrong all the continuous spell/trap/field magic/equip magic will get sent to grave
9. if i instant fuse, the target was flipped face down by book of moon, does it die during the end phase? [i am asking because i saw a video from duelingdays and they used summoner of illusion to pull out a extrio and it got flipped face down, but end phase it stays on the field. is it that illusion summoner ruling is different from instant fuse?]
no it doesnt die. | |
| | | curryman Senior Duelist
Number of posts : 972 Age : 33 Location : hougang to ang mo kio Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Mon May 02, 2011 9:51 pm | |
| - hamtaro wrote:
- 7. if i have a ladd on my field and my opponent activates vahala, it's effect is negated and it stays as a blank card on the field forever. correct or wrong?
wrong all the continuous spell/trap/field magic/equip magic will get sent to grave
9. if i instant fuse, the target was flipped face down by book of moon, does it die during the end phase? [i am asking because i saw a video from duelingdays and they used summoner of illusion to pull out a extrio and it got flipped face down, but end phase it stays on the field. is it that illusion summoner ruling is different from instant fuse?]
no it doesnt die. ty : ) | |
| | | suresh4e Duelist
Number of posts : 85 Age : 27 Location : Pandan Gardens Registration date : 2011-02-12
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D Mon May 02, 2011 9:58 pm | |
| 8. No. Because by the time you draw the card, it would have meant that the summon was successful and has fully resolved. This would mean that the TG Werewolf that you drew no longer has something to chain to and has missed its timing. Therefore, it cannot be SP'ed | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: more rulings to ask ;D | |
| |
| | | | more rulings to ask ;D | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| LATEST NEWS | Dear members,
Be sure to post a message once you have been registered. As I had just cleared 100+ member with no post in the forum. I am trying to keep the forum neat and tidy. Those users who just create an account to just come in to look and see, I am sorry but I have deleted the account. I would believe only the trading post is will be viewable to members so there should be a need for a guest to create an account to see what events we are having.
Also take note that TRADING THREADs are going to be auto prune everyday. Condition will be a post every 7 days else it will be deleted. Again its to keep neat and tidy in the forum.
Thanks for understanding. |
|