Ancient Forest GB Control

another paper idea deck...

Ancient Forest GB Control

Main Deck:

Monsters: 14

3x Slave Tiger
1x Gladial Beast Retiari
2x Gladial Beast Laquari
2x Gladial Beast Equeste
2x Gladial Beast Darius
1x Gladial Beast Bestiari
1x Gladial Beast Murmillo
1x Sangan
1x Morphing Jar

Spells: 14

2x Gladial Trainer
3x Ancient Forest
2x Gladial Beast Inner Strength
2x Fissure
1x Smashing Ground
2x Book of Moon
2x Shrink

Traps: 12

3x Dark Bribe
3x Gladial Beast War Chariot
2x Waboku
2x Bottomless Trap Hole
1x Mirror Force
1x Torrential Tribute

Side Deck: 15

1x Summon Priest
1x Rescue Cat
2x Gladial Beast Samnite
2x X- Saber Airbellum
3x Raiou
2x Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer
2x Light Imprisoning Mirror
2x Dust Tornado

Extra Deck:

3x Gladial Beast Kaiseris
2x Gladial Beast Heraklinos
1x Arcanite Magician
1x Black Rose Dragon
1x Ancient Fairy Dragon
1x Brionac
1x Goyo Guardian

FIXES:

8/9/09

-3 raiou (sided)
-3 d-fissure
+1 darius
+1 retiari (mained)
+2 moon
+2 Gladial beast inner strength

Raiou doesn't with forest. You might want to think about that.

How abt remove D-fissure.
use retari instead of D-fissure.

gladiator force + 500 attack, return 2 GB name to deck from grave.

opinion, u may not use it.
Up to .

1st. u must understand if u play D gb. 3 dimension fissure is nt enuf. need the monster varients too.

2nd. all GB decks require book of moon to survive.

3rd. y do use slave tiger for? the darius->beastri->gyzarus doesnt work that well anymore

and u r contradicting yrself by using sangan.

@ axehead

raiou isn't there for beating, its just to get around the stuff that ss and blasts stuff *ahemjdahem*. but yeah i see what u mean. any candidate to provide more control? thnx =]

@ lingbu

D-Fissure makes attacking with forest out alot more painful. i think u feel d-fissure might be weak now that breaker is at 3 right? correct me if i'm wrong.
personally i don't find gb inner strength useful in this build esp if i'm keeping d-fissure. it can work wonders in other builds tho, i agree.

@ jadow

oh wow i missed the whole sangan thing.... sad. thanks for pointing it out! uhh slave tiger can be used as a means of extra removal through murmillo and bestiari. darius can be used while fissure isn't out, and even when it is out 1700 is still quite a reasonable beastick for tagging out

monster variants meaning... banisher of radiance? anything else? yeah i'm not very experienced with playing dimension glads hehe...

yeah and i'm trying to fit in at least 2 moons. i could -1 sangan -1 slave tiger for them, but that leaves no space for banisher. btw how many banishers to run?

slyx183 wrote:

@ axehead

raiou isn't there for beating, its just to get around the stuff that ss and blasts stuff *ahemjdahem*. but yeah i see what u mean. any candidate to provide more control? thnx =]

1st: raiou + D fissure = wow ( no effect )
2nd: summoning in GB is impt as in a gaget deck, y waste a summoning on raiou? i know raiou has stop search effect and prevent special summon ( synchro etc ), but on the whole, it is not called a GB deck for nth.
3rd: u wan more control, 'hedge guard' is one option. act as waboku.
again: up to u to decide. we ar jus giving opinion.

slyx183 wrote:

@ lingbu

D-Fissure makes attacking with forest out alot more painful. i think u feel d-fissure might be weak now that breaker is at 3 right? correct me if i'm wrong.
personally i don't find gb inner strength useful in this build esp if i'm keeping d-fissure. it can work wonders in other builds tho, i agree.

y would i have to think that breaker is a threat to GB?
is the bottomless fake? is the chariot fake?
if u faced the 'flush' , or other weird traps that ppl have ( trap hole WTF ) and all yr GB gone to out of game, IT"S a wonderful thing ? instead of dimension, i recommend retari, D -fissure really contradicts GB. It is good against grave based, but when yr GB dun go to grave, even yr equest cant save u.
Eventually yr GB will run out, making u left wif Fish and Chip, and other GB hu have good effect but weak attacks.
Dun try to explain that u have gyzarus to overturn table. If u cant protect yr GB , i see no point of them going out of game.
D-fissure is strong. But more than the users i saw did not handle D-fissure to the best.
And lastly continuous or face up cards that jam yr trap , magic slot are not proper options ( unlike cosmo n burn ).
N the thing is IF U are so suey that u didnt draw yr D-fissure, and up against grave based, u may oso complain abt it, so y not jus combine other assistance cards ( traps , other GB etc ). They can support each other.
So i wanna quote my sayings again" even if u have the best deck, withou proper skill , u are just spoiling the recipe." ( new quote )

slyx183 wrote:

@ jadow

oh wow i missed the whole sangan thing.... sad. thanks for pointing it out! uhh slave tiger can be used as a means of extra removal through murmillo and bestiari. darius can be used while fissure isn't out, and even when it is out 1700 is still quite a reasonable beastick for tagging out

monster variants meaning... banisher of radiance? anything else? yeah i'm not very experienced with playing dimension glads hehe...

yeah and i'm trying to fit in at least 2 moons. i could -1 sangan -1 slave tiger for them, but that leaves no space for banisher. btw how many banishers to run?

No banisher, summoning is impt, y the hell u wanna remove yr cards ? like ina heavy storm, u cant protect yr traps and all yr chariots ( maybe 1 ) get out of game. GG
even u realised yr GB can get throw out of game and never retrieved back, so y did u even wanna make them suffer?
u can recycle them wif other cards in GB instead.
GB's power up +500 card. the second effect is incredibly strong too, recycle after using GB's attack and effect.

Lingbu again,
long replies but good knowledge.

WOAH I JUST REALIZED

gb inner strength then my gb tio destroy by forest oso nvm. need to go test.... XD oh and i though raiou's effect was tribute not send to grave.... sry ah.

thanks lingbu. i think by outing fissure i can leave 2 raiou for more book of moon and inner strength. u know, just in case lah (the raious).

wooo i feel like i have a new revelation, but somehow everyone else around me knew it b4 i did... -,-

i dont really like the idea of playing ancient forest in GB right now with the current banlist. with zombies coming back ,ancient forest will favour more to zombie because it helps them getting send to the grave easily .side deck your ancient forest because this card will be useless in GB mirror match and we are expecting to see many upcoming GB decks such as dimensional and bla bla bla .like what lingbu said , play hedgeguard . This card really can change tables around and cause a big change in the match .Try playing dimensional GB . It will be great cause now with Grave Bf , lightlord and syncro undead emerging , it will totally kick some [censored by admin] @#$%^&*. Correct me if i'm wrong

lol flame much?

no offense, but telling me to change my deck idea entirely just because it won't be "the meta" isn't really helpful. instead of siding out forest, perhaps i could side IN d-fissures when playing zombies, ll's, and grave bf? hedge guard is quite an interesting tech that i have seen played b4, but never really got down to trying it myself.. maybe i should haha.

anyway thanks for the help. i know u're trying to help by suggesting a more competition friendly deck, but my purpose for this thread is to open up something new, much like my other recent decks. i find it more fun to play with non-meta decks and win than play with a deck everyone else is using JUST for the sake of winning.

slyx183 wrote:

lol flame much?

no offense, but telling me to change my deck idea entirely just because it won't be "the meta" isn't really helpful. instead of siding out forest, perhaps i could side IN d-fissures when playing zombies, ll's, and grave bf? hedge guard is quite an interesting tech that i have seen played b4, but never really got down to trying it myself.. maybe i should haha.

anyway thanks for the help. i know u're trying to help by suggesting a more competition friendly deck, but my purpose for this thread is to open up something new, much like my other recent decks. i find it more fun to play with non-meta decks and win than play with a deck everyone else is using JUST for the sake of winning.

well i thought u were a competitive player. nevermind then , I was just giving my suggestions . i am not trying to flame dude. dont get my message entirely wrong. PEACE MAN.

after the ban list the only meta is lightlord, maybe we shld invent smthing new. but he also use dimensional fissure , so its kinda similar to dimension GB

andrewspectra wrote:

well i thought u were a competitive player. nevermind then , I was just giving my suggestions . i am not trying to flame dude. dont get my message entirely wrong. PEACE MAN.

oops it seems like i offended u man. sry. haha yeah i play competitively occasionally, but the players where i live (CHEENA) aren't up to standard compared to when i come back to singapore and play during summer vacation. so i can afford to lay back and play tier 2 decks and still have a decent win rate lol. of course when i come back to singapore out busts my lightlords (although their still not very tier 1 IMO, too random) XD. again, sry man. no bad intentions from either end, i suppose?